How this is made
This site teaches people about AI. It would be dishonest to pretend none was involved in producing it, and foolish not to use it. So the policy is published.
AI may draft. Outlines, first passes, alternative phrasings, summarising a source, checking readability.
AI may not decide. What is taught, what is cut, what the time estimate is, whether a claim is true, or whether a step actually works.
A person does the doing. Every step in every published lesson is performed on a real machine by a person who watches what happens. No lesson describes something nobody has done. It has never opened Outlook to check the button is still where the lesson says it is. A person does that, every time.
A person checks and publishes. Nothing here is auto-published. Six of the twelve checks require a person and they are listed unticked on every build until they are done. Right now, four of them are unticked on all eight lessons, and every lesson says so at the top.
Why there is no name on this
Plenty of free training is published anonymously by institutions, which lets nobody be responsible for anything. That is not what is happening here.
The claim is not a named person wrote this. The claim is a person did this, against a process you can read and a build you can check. Three things make that hold up: the method is published in full and sits in the top-level navigation; the build log is published, including the checks that are currently failing; and the address at the bottom of every page is real and is answered.
Corrections get published rather than edited in quietly. If something here is wrong, that is what happens to it.